Garten - Benutzerbeiträge [de]

US Authorities Arrest Relatives Of Late Iranian Military Commander Who Were Living In Los Angeles

2026-05-07T23:43:56Z

JodiP59577820: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „a text-decoration: none; color: #464feb; tr th, tr td border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; tr th background-color: #f5f5f5; In a dramatic development that has drawn international attention, US authorities have arrested close relatives of the late Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani who were residing in Los Angeles. The arrests, carried out by federal immigration and law‑enforcement officials, mark another significant episode in the ongoing geopolitical…“

a text-decoration: none; color: #464feb; tr th, tr td border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; tr th background-color: #f5f5f5; In a dramatic development that has drawn international attention, US authorities have arrested close relatives of the late Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani who were residing in Los Angeles. The arrests, carried out by federal immigration and law‑enforcement officials, mark another significant episode in the ongoing geopolitical tension between the United States and Iran. According to official statements, the niece and grandniece of Soleimani were taken into custody after the US government revoked their legal status, alleging that they had engaged in activities incompatible with American immigration laws and national security interests. The case has sparked debate over immigration enforcement, national security, political symbolism, [http://ukbreakingnews24x7.com ukbreakingnews24x7] and the broader implications for Iranian families living in the United States. Who Was Qassem Soleimani and Why His Name Still Matters To understand the significance of the arrests, it is essential to revisit the legacy of Qassem Soleimani, one of the most influential and controversial military figures in modern Middle Eastern history. Soleimani’s Role in Iran’s Military Strategy Qassem Soleimani served as the commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps – Quds Force, a unit responsible for Iran’s extraterritorial military and intelligence operations. Over decades, he became a central architect of Iran’s regional strategy across Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and beyond. From the US perspective, Soleimani was accused of orchestrating attacks that resulted in the deaths of American and allied forces. For Iran and its supporters, he was seen as a heroic defender of national sovereignty. The 2020 US Drone Strike In January 2020, Soleimani was killed in a US drone strike near Baghdad International Airport, an operation ordered by then‑President Donald Trump. The assassination triggered massive protests in Iran, heightened fears of war, and permanently deepened hostility between Washington and Tehran. Since then, Soleimani’s name has continued to carry symbolic weight in both countries—making any action involving his family particularly sensitive and politically charged. Who Was Arrested in Los Angeles? Identity of the Detainees US officials confirmed that those arrested were: Hamideh Soleimani Afshar, identified as the niece of Qassem Soleimani Her adult daughter, Soleimani’s grandniece Both women had been living in Los Angeles, California, reportedly for several years. Their Immigration Status Authorities stated that the women had originally entered the US lawfully and later obtained lawful permanent resident (green card) status. However, that status was revoked shortly before their arrests. US officials alleged that the revocation was carried out after a review of their activities and public conduct, which authorities claimed conflicted with the terms of their residency and US national security interests. Why US Authorities Arrested Them Allegations by the State Department According to statements released by US government agencies, including the State Department: The two women allegedly publicly praised the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which the US designates as a terrorist organization They were accused of celebrating attacks on American military personnel Officials claimed they promoted Iranian regime propaganda while living in the United States These allegations formed the basis for revoking their residency and initiating immigration enforcement proceedings. Role of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) The arrests were carried out by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers, who detained the women pending immigration proceedings.

UK Breaking News24x7

2026-05-06T09:00:20Z

JodiP59577820:

In a dramatic and closely watched political development, Hillary Clinton testifies in House Oversight Committee Epstein probe, bringing renewed attention to one of the most controversial investigations in recent U.S. history. The hearing, led by the House Oversight Committee, focused on connections, accountability, and unanswered questions surrounding disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. With media networks, legal analysts, and political observers tuned in nationwide, Clinton’s testimony has sparked debate across party lines. In this in-depth article, we break down the background, key moments, political reactions, and what this probe could mean moving forward. Background: The Epstein Scandal and Political Fallout The Epstein case has cast a long shadow over global elites, politicians, [http://ukbreakingnews24x7.com uk breaking news24x7] and business figures for years. After his 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Epstein’s death in custody intensified public suspicion and fueled numerous conspiracy theories. While Epstein maintained relationships with prominent figures across political and social spectrums, renewed scrutiny emerged over political links and government accountability. The latest chapter unfolded when the House Oversight Committee initiated a probe aimed at clarifying: The extent of political figures’ associations with Epstein Whether any federal oversight failures occurred Potential misuse of influence or government access The decision to call Hillary Clinton to testify reflects the committee’s focus on transparency rather than predetermined conclusions. Why Was Hillary Clinton Called to Testify? Clinton’s testimony centers on: Her role as former U.S. Secretary of State Her interactions with individuals later connected to Epstein Allegations raised in public discourse regarding access and influence It’s important to clarify that no formal criminal charges have been filed against Clinton related to Epstein. The hearing’s scope focused on information gathering and oversight responsibilities rather than criminal prosecution. Committee members from both parties emphasized that the objective was to ensure accountability in public institutions. Key Moments from the Hearing The session featured hours of questioning covering political, procedural, and reputational aspects. 1. Questions on Awareness and Contact Clinton was asked whether she had direct contact with Epstein or knowledge of his activities during her tenure in government. She reiterated that she had no personal involvement in or awareness of any criminal misconduct. 2. Travel and Association Inquiries Some members questioned whether individuals within her broader network had interactions with Epstein. Clinton stated that any such interactions would have been outside her knowledge and not part of official government business. 3. Oversight and Institutional Safeguards Several lawmakers shifted focus toward systemic issues, asking how government agencies screen high-profile individuals with international connections. This broadened the hearing beyond Clinton personally and toward structural reforms. Political Reactions: A Divided Response The reaction to Clinton’s testimony has been sharply divided. Republican Perspective Some Republican lawmakers framed the testimony as part of a broader effort to examine elite accountability.

UK Breaking News24x7

2026-05-06T08:48:41Z

JodiP59577820:

In a dramatic and closely watched political development, Hillary Clinton testifies in House Oversight Committee Epstein probe, bringing renewed attention to one of the most controversial investigations in recent U.S. history. The hearing, led by the House Oversight Committee, focused on connections, accountability, and unanswered questions surrounding disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. With media networks, legal analysts, and political observers tuned in nationwide, [http://ukbreakingnews24x7.com uk breaking news] Clinton’s testimony has sparked debate across party lines. In this in-depth article, we break down the background, key moments, political reactions, and what this probe could mean moving forward. Background: The Epstein Scandal and Political Fallout The Epstein case has cast a long shadow over global elites, politicians, and business figures for years. After his 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Epstein’s death in custody intensified public suspicion and fueled numerous conspiracy theories. While Epstein maintained relationships with prominent figures across political and social spectrums, renewed scrutiny emerged over political links and government accountability. The latest chapter unfolded when the House Oversight Committee initiated a probe aimed at clarifying: The extent of political figures’ associations with Epstein Whether any federal oversight failures occurred Potential misuse of influence or government access The decision to call Hillary Clinton to testify reflects the committee’s focus on transparency rather than predetermined conclusions. Why Was Hillary Clinton Called to Testify? Clinton’s testimony centers on: Her role as former U.S. Secretary of State Her interactions with individuals later connected to Epstein Allegations raised in public discourse regarding access and influence It’s important to clarify that no formal criminal charges have been filed against Clinton related to Epstein. The hearing’s scope focused on information gathering and oversight responsibilities rather than criminal prosecution. Committee members from both parties emphasized that the objective was to ensure accountability in public institutions. Key Moments from the Hearing The session featured hours of questioning covering political, procedural, and reputational aspects. 1. Questions on Awareness and Contact Clinton was asked whether she had direct contact with Epstein or knowledge of his activities during her tenure in government. She reiterated that she had no personal involvement in or awareness of any criminal misconduct. 2. Travel and Association Inquiries Some members questioned whether individuals within her broader network had interactions with Epstein. Clinton stated that any such interactions would have been outside her knowledge and not part of official government business. 3. Oversight and Institutional Safeguards Several lawmakers shifted focus toward systemic issues, asking how government agencies screen high-profile individuals with international connections. This broadened the hearing beyond Clinton personally and toward structural reforms. Political Reactions: A Divided Response The reaction to Clinton’s testimony has been sharply divided. Republican Perspective Some Republican lawmakers framed the testimony as part of a broader effort to examine elite accountability. They argue that public trust requires thorough examination of any potential links between powerful figures and Epstein. Democratic Perspective Democrats characterized the hearing as politically motivated, suggesting that it risks turning oversight into partisan spectacle. They argue that unless concrete evidence emerges, continued focus may distract from legislative priorities. The Broader Epstein Investigation Context The probe intersects with ongoing legal scrutiny involving figures connected to Epstein, including: Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted on federal charges related to sex trafficking Civil litigation brought by survivors Institutional reviews within federal agencies The case has expanded beyond individual culpability into discussions about power, privilege, and systemic failures.

Richard Desmond defeated in £1.3bn National Lottery battle

2026-05-05T18:21:55Z

JodiP59577820: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „The dramatic legal showdown involving Richard Desmond and the UK’s National Lottery has finally reached a decisive turning point. After years of legal challenges, high-stakes arguments, and millions spent on litigation, Desmond has been defeated in his £1.3 billion claim against the UK Gambling Commission. This landmark ruling is not just another business dispute—it carries major implications for public funds, regulatory transparency, and the fut…“

The dramatic legal showdown involving Richard Desmond and the UK’s National Lottery has finally reached a decisive turning point. After years of legal challenges, high-stakes arguments, and millions spent on litigation, Desmond has been defeated in his £1.3 billion claim against the UK Gambling Commission. This landmark ruling is not just another business dispute—it carries major implications for public funds, regulatory transparency, and the future of one of the UK’s most important public contracts. 📰 Breaking News Overview (April 17, 2026) Headline: Richard Desmond loses £1.3bn National Lottery legal battle Court: UK High Court Judge: Mrs Justice Joanna Smith Key Outcome: Claim dismissed entirely Source & Date: [https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/apr/17/richard-desmond-loses-damages-battle-with-gambling-commission-ending-national-lottery-dispute?utm_source=chatgpt.com The Guardian report on Desmond’s defeat] (Published April 17, 2026) [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/04/17/richard-desmond-defeated-in-13bn-national-lottery-battle/?utm_source=chatgpt.com The Telegraph breaking coverage] (Published April 17, 2026) According to reports, the High Court ruled that there was no evidence of "manifest error" in the way the National Lottery licence was awarded. Who Is Richard Desmond? 6 Richard Desmond is a well-known British billionaire businessman and former media owner. He built his fortune through: Ownership of the Daily Express Acquisition and sale of Channel 5 Founder of the Health Lottery He has long been known for bold business moves—and equally bold legal battles. His net worth has been estimated at around £1.3 billion. What Was the £1.3bn National Lottery Battle About? At the heart of the dispute was the awarding of the fourth National Lottery licence, one of the UK’s most lucrative public contracts. Key Players UK Gambling Commission – Oversaw the bidding process Allwyn – Winner of the licence (since 2024) Camelot – Previous operator Desmond’s Companies – Northern & Shell and The New Lottery Company Timeline of Events 2019–2022: The Bid Desmond entered the race to run the National Lottery. His company spent £17.5 million preparing the bid. 2022: Licence Awarded The contract was awarded to Allwyn, a Czech-owned operator. The decision sparked immediate controversy and legal challenges. 2022–2025: Legal Battles Begin Desmond filed multiple lawsuits claiming the process was flawed. Allegations included: Lack of transparency Conflicts of interest Unfair scoring criteria 2026: Final High Court Verdict The High Court dismissed the £1.3bn claim entirely. Judge ruled the process was lawful and fair. Why Did Richard Desmond Lose the Case? The ruling by Mrs Justice Smith was comprehensive—and at times critical. 1. No Evidence of "Manifest Error" The court found no serious mistakes in the Gambling Commission’s process. 2. Competitors Were Not Unfairly Favoured Claims against Allwyn and Camelot were rejected. No conflict of interest or [http://ukbreakingnews24x7.com breaking news] unfair advantage was proven.

The Cage review – an astonishing, deeply moving state-of-the-nation thriller

2026-05-05T01:18:03Z

JodiP59577820: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „When a TV drama is described as "an astonishing, deeply moving state-of-the-nation thriller," expectations immediately soar. Yet The Cage, the latest BBC crime series from writer Tony Schumacher, doesn’t just meet those expectations—it quietly exceeds them. On the surface, The Cage appears to be another heist-driven crime thriller set in a casino. But beneath the flashing lights and high-stakes tension lies something far more profound: a raw, emot…“

When a TV drama is described as "an astonishing, deeply moving state-of-the-nation thriller," expectations immediately soar. Yet The Cage, the latest BBC crime series from writer Tony Schumacher, doesn’t just meet those expectations—it quietly exceeds them. On the surface, The Cage appears to be another heist-driven crime thriller set in a casino. But beneath the flashing lights and high-stakes tension lies something far more profound: a raw, emotionally charged exploration of modern Britain’s social struggles—poverty, addiction, family breakdown, and the crushing weight of survival.   What is The Cage about? 6 The Cage is a five-part British crime thriller that premiered on BBC One and BBC iPlayer on 26 April 2026. At its core, the series follows two casino workers: Leanne (Sheridan Smith) – a struggling single mother dealing with overwhelming financial and family pressures Matty (Michael Socha) – a troubled manager battling addiction, debt, and personal demons Both characters independently begin stealing money from their workplace—only to discover they’re entangled in something far more dangerous: a criminal network involving money laundering and organized crime. But here’s the twist—this isn’t really a story about crime. It’s a story about desperation. A "state-of-the-nation" thriller: What does that mean? The phrase "state-of-the-nation drama" is often overused. In The Cage, it feels earned. The series reflects a Britain where: Working-class families are pushed to the brink Housing insecurity looms large Addiction cycles remain unresolved Social support systems feel fragile or absent Leanne’s fear of eviction and Matty’s spiraling debt aren’t just plot devices—they’re reflections of real-world anxieties. As highlighted in early reviews, the show explores "desperation, societal neglect, and the rare possibility of redemption." Rather than judging its characters, The Cage asks viewers to understand them. And [http://ukbreakingnews24x7.com ukbreakingnews24x7] that’s what makes it so emotionally devastating. Performances that elevate the entire series 5 Sheridan Smith as Leanne Sheridan Smith delivers exactly what you’d expect—an authentic, emotionally grounded performance that makes Leanne feel painfully real. She portrays a woman constantly on the edge, yet still holding everything together for her family. Her performance captures: Quiet desperation Maternal resilience Emotional exhaustion Michael Socha as Matty (The standout) Michael Socha, however, is the true revelation. Critics have singled him out for delivering a "nuanced portrayal" filled with vulnerability and complexity. Matty is chaotic, flawed, often frustrating—but deeply human. Socha balances humor and heartbreak with remarkable precision, making him one of the most compelling characters on British TV this year. Supporting cast The supporting performances—from Barry Sloane’s menacing crime boss to Geraldine James’ layered presence—add depth without overshadowing the central duo. Writing and storytelling: Tony Schumacher’s signature realism 6 Tony Schumacher, known for The Responder, brings the same gritty realism to The Cage.

UK Breaking News24x7

2026-05-05T01:15:47Z

JodiP59577820:

In a dramatic and closely watched political development, Hillary Clinton testifies in House Oversight Committee Epstein probe, bringing renewed attention to one of the most controversial investigations in recent U.S. history. The hearing, led by the House Oversight Committee, focused on connections, accountability, [http://ukbreakingnews24x7.com uk breaking news] and unanswered questions surrounding disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. With media networks, legal analysts, and political observers tuned in nationwide, Clinton’s testimony has sparked debate across party lines. In this in-depth article, we break down the background, key moments, political reactions, and what this probe could mean moving forward. Background: The Epstein Scandal and Political Fallout The Epstein case has cast a long shadow over global elites, politicians, and business figures for years. After his 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Epstein’s death in custody intensified public suspicion and fueled numerous conspiracy theories. While Epstein maintained relationships with prominent figures across political and social spectrums, renewed scrutiny emerged over political links and government accountability. The latest chapter unfolded when the House Oversight Committee initiated a probe aimed at clarifying: The extent of political figures’ associations with Epstein Whether any federal oversight failures occurred Potential misuse of influence or government access The decision to call Hillary Clinton to testify reflects the committee’s focus on transparency rather than predetermined conclusions. Why Was Hillary Clinton Called to Testify? Clinton’s testimony centers on: Her role as former U.S. Secretary of State Her interactions with individuals later connected to Epstein Allegations raised in public discourse regarding access and influence It’s important to clarify that no formal criminal charges have been filed against Clinton related to Epstein. The hearing’s scope focused on information gathering and oversight responsibilities rather than criminal prosecution. Committee members from both parties emphasized that the objective was to ensure accountability in public institutions. Key Moments from the Hearing The session featured hours of questioning covering political, procedural, and reputational aspects. 1. Questions on Awareness and Contact Clinton was asked whether she had direct contact with Epstein or knowledge of his activities during her tenure in government. She reiterated that she had no personal involvement in or awareness of any criminal misconduct. 2. Travel and Association Inquiries Some members questioned whether individuals within her broader network had interactions with Epstein. Clinton stated that any such interactions would have been outside her knowledge and not part of official government business. 3. Oversight and Institutional Safeguards Several lawmakers shifted focus toward systemic issues, asking how government agencies screen high-profile individuals with international connections. This broadened the hearing beyond Clinton personally and toward structural reforms. Political Reactions: A Divided Response The reaction to Clinton’s testimony has been sharply divided. Republican Perspective Some Republican lawmakers framed the testimony as part of a broader effort to examine elite accountability. They argue that public trust requires thorough examination of any potential links between powerful figures and Epstein.

UK Breaking News24x7

2026-05-05T00:34:19Z

JodiP59577820:

In a dramatic and closely watched political development, Hillary Clinton testifies in House Oversight Committee Epstein probe, bringing renewed attention to one of the most controversial investigations in recent U.S. history. The hearing, led by the House Oversight Committee, focused on connections, accountability, and unanswered questions surrounding disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. With media networks, legal analysts, and political observers tuned in nationwide, Clinton’s testimony has sparked debate across party lines. In this in-depth article, [http://ukbreakingnews24x7.com uk breaking news] we break down the background, key moments, political reactions, and what this probe could mean moving forward. Background: The Epstein Scandal and Political Fallout The Epstein case has cast a long shadow over global elites, politicians, and business figures for years. After his 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Epstein’s death in custody intensified public suspicion and fueled numerous conspiracy theories. While Epstein maintained relationships with prominent figures across political and social spectrums, renewed scrutiny emerged over political links and government accountability. The latest chapter unfolded when the House Oversight Committee initiated a probe aimed at clarifying: The extent of political figures’ associations with Epstein Whether any federal oversight failures occurred Potential misuse of influence or government access The decision to call Hillary Clinton to testify reflects the committee’s focus on transparency rather than predetermined conclusions. Why Was Hillary Clinton Called to Testify? Clinton’s testimony centers on: Her role as former U.S. Secretary of State Her interactions with individuals later connected to Epstein Allegations raised in public discourse regarding access and influence It’s important to clarify that no formal criminal charges have been filed against Clinton related to Epstein. The hearing’s scope focused on information gathering and oversight responsibilities rather than criminal prosecution. Committee members from both parties emphasized that the objective was to ensure accountability in public institutions. Key Moments from the Hearing The session featured hours of questioning covering political, procedural, and reputational aspects. 1. Questions on Awareness and Contact Clinton was asked whether she had direct contact with Epstein or knowledge of his activities during her tenure in government. She reiterated that she had no personal involvement in or awareness of any criminal misconduct. 2. Travel and Association Inquiries Some members questioned whether individuals within her broader network had interactions with Epstein. Clinton stated that any such interactions would have been outside her knowledge and not part of official government business. 3. Oversight and Institutional Safeguards Several lawmakers shifted focus toward systemic issues, asking how government agencies screen high-profile individuals with international connections. This broadened the hearing beyond Clinton personally and toward structural reforms. Political Reactions: A Divided Response The reaction to Clinton’s testimony has been sharply divided. Republican Perspective Some Republican lawmakers framed the testimony as part of a broader effort to examine elite accountability. They argue that public trust requires thorough examination of any potential links between powerful figures and Epstein. Democratic Perspective Democrats characterized the hearing as politically motivated, suggesting that it risks turning oversight into partisan spectacle. They argue that unless concrete evidence emerges, continued focus may distract from legislative priorities.

Britain’s Health Shift: Fitness Trends Changing Everyday Life

2026-05-05T00:20:44Z

JodiP59577820:

Britain is undergoing a quiet but powerful transformation—one that’s reshaping how people live, work, eat, and move. Across cities like London, Manchester, and Birmingham, as well as smaller towns and rural communities, a new health-conscious mindset is taking hold. Fitness is no longer confined to gyms or elite athletes. It has become a lifestyle, woven into daily routines and cultural habits. This shift isn’t just about looking good—it’s about living better. From mental wellbeing to longevity, Britain’s evolving fitness culture is influencing everything from commuting habits to food choices, workplace policies, and even social life. Let’s explore how fitness trends are changing everyday life across the UK—and why this movement is only gaining momentum. The Rise of Everyday Fitness Culture Fitness in Britain used to be something people "fit in" when they had time. Today, it’s becoming a non-negotiable part of daily life. People are increasingly prioritising movement throughout the day, not just during structured workouts. Walking meetings, standing desks, lunchtime yoga, and active commuting are becoming common. According to initiatives promoted by organisations like NHS and Sport England, even small bursts of activity can significantly improve health outcomes. Key Drivers Behind the Shift Several factors are fuelling this nationwide change: Post-pandemic awareness of health and immunity Digital fitness accessibility through apps and online classes Rising mental health awareness Increased workplace flexibility Government-backed health campaigns The result? Fitness is no longer a niche interest—it’s a mainstream lifestyle. Home Workouts and Digital Fitness Boom One of the most significant changes in Britain’s fitness landscape is the explosion of home workouts. During lockdowns, millions turned to online platforms, and many haven’t looked back. Apps, YouTube workouts, and virtual personal trainers have made fitness more accessible than ever. Why Home Fitness Works No commuting time Flexible scheduling Lower costs compared to gym memberships Privacy and comfort Platforms like Peloton and Nike Training Club have built loyal user bases in the [http://ukbreakingnews24x7.com uk news24x7], offering guided sessions ranging from strength training to meditation. Even traditional gyms are adapting, offering hybrid memberships that combine in-person and digital experiences. Gym Culture Reinvented While home workouts are thriving, gyms haven’t disappeared—they’ve evolved. Modern gyms in Britain are no longer just rows of machines. They’re becoming wellness hubs offering: Functional training zones Group classes like HIIT and spin Recovery services (saunas, ice baths) Social spaces Boutique fitness studios, particularly in London, are booming. These studios focus on specialised experiences—boxing, barre, reformer Pilates—and often foster strong community vibes. The Social Side of Fitness Fitness is increasingly social. People are joining: Running clubs Cycling groups CrossFit communities Outdoor boot camps This shift turns exercise into a shared experience, making it more enjoyable and sustainable. The Walking Revolution Walking is having a major moment in Britain. What was once seen as a basic activity is now being celebrated as one of the most effective and accessible forms of exercise. Why Walking is Trending Low impact and suitable for all ages No equipment required Boosts mental wellbeing Easily integrated into daily routines Urban planning in cities like Bristol and Edinburgh is increasingly prioritising walkability, with more pedestrian-friendly zones and green spaces.

Benutzer:JodiP59577820

2026-04-14T21:18:45Z

JodiP59577820: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „Hi, everybody! My name is Bess. It is a little about myself: I live in Italy, my city of Capriano Del Colle. It's called often Eastern or cultural capital of BS. I've married 2 years ago. I have 2 children - a son (Lionel) and the daughter (Aleisha). We all like Machining. Feel free to surf to my website [http://ukbreakingnews24x7.com uk news24x7]“

Hi, everybody! My name is Bess. It is a little about myself: I live in Italy, my city of Capriano Del Colle. It's called often Eastern or cultural capital of BS. I've married 2 years ago. I have 2 children - a son (Lionel) and the daughter (Aleisha). We all like Machining. Feel free to surf to my website [http://ukbreakingnews24x7.com uk news24x7]